Skip to main content
European Commission logo
Joint Research Centre

GECO 2025

Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2025: Market Competitiveness of Clean Energy Technologies

Competitiveness of clean technologies

Current market conditions hold back the progress of key technologies over the coming decades. Several low-carbon technologies, such as solar, wind and electric vehicles, are broadly competitive with the incumbent fossil fuel technologies in many world markets. These technologies are expected to achieve high levels of deployment with little to no additional policy support. 

horizontal bar graph with competitiveness indicator by technology

Several other low-carbon technologies, such as synthetic fuels and CO2 capture, are not expected to achieve the levels of deployment foreseen in a scenario aligned with the 1.5°C climate target without additional policy support.

Implementation and ambition gaps

Announced NDCs fail to show an increase in climate change mitigation ambition. Under current legislated policies, global emissions peak immediately and decrease gradually to 2005 levels by 2050. 

line graph with emissions (left) and temperature (right) projections in GECO 2025

The long-term emissions trajectory under currently-enacted policies shows a similar evolution compared to last year, where emission reductions resulting from continuing rapid deployment of renewables and electric vehicles globally has been offset by a reversal of climate action in the US.

Trade vs Climate policy

GECO 2025 finds that there is overall minimal interaction between climate and trade policy when considering the effect on global GDP. Fragmentation of global trade causes only limited GHG emission reductions and hampers deep decarbonisation. Fragmentation has a negative effect on global production volumes, which puts some limited downward pressure on GHG emissions. 

line and bar graphs showing the evolution of GHG emissions and GDP in GECO 2025 scenarios

However, fragmentation also makes the global economy more emissions intensive, by fracturing global patterns of specialisation and encouraging domestic production where this might be less efficient. In a deep decarbonisation scenario, this increase in emission intensity dominates the output effect. As a result, fragmentation hampers the deep decarbonisation that is necessary in a 1.5°C scenario.