References

[1] Bedford T., Modelling with dependent uncertainties: a toolbox of techniques, 1997.

[2] Draper, N. R., and Smith H., (1981). Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

[3] T. Homma, A. Saltelli, Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of model output, Reliability Engrg. System Safety 52 (1) (1996) 1–17.

[4] Iman R. L. and Shortencarier M. J. (1984), A FORTRAN 77 program and user's guide for the generation of Latin hypercube and random samples for use with computer models. SANDIA Laboratory report SAND83-2365.

[5] Iman R. L., and Conover W. J., (1982). “A distribution free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables”, Comm. Statist.-Simula. Computa, 11(3), 311-334.

[6] Iman R. L., Davenport J. M. and Zeigler D. K. (1980), Latin hypercube sampling (Program user's guide). SANDIA Laboratory report SAND79-1473.

[7] Iman, R. L., and Helton, J. C., (1988). A comparison of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models. Risk Analysis, 8(1):71-90.

[8] Ishigami, T. and Homma, T. (1990). “An Important Quantification Technique in Uncertainty Analysis for Computer Models”, In the proceedings of the First International Symposium on Uncertainty Modelling and Analysis, pp398-403.

[9] Meeuwissen A.M.H. & R.M. Cooke, Tree dependent random variables, Report 94-28 TWI, Delft University of Technology, 1994.

[10] Morris M. D. (1987), Two Stage Factor Screening Procedures Using Multiple Grouping Assignments, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 16(10), 3051-3067

[11] Morris M.D. (1991), Factorial Sampling Plans for Preliminary Computational Experiments. Technometrics, vol. 33, no. 2.

[12] OECD/NEA PSAC User group, 1989, PSACOIN Level E Intercomparison, An international code intercomparison exercise on a hypothetical safety assessment case study for radioactive waste disposal systems, OECD/NEA publication. Paris.

[13] Saltelli, K. Chan, M. Scott, Mathematical and statistical methods for sensitivity analysis, John Wiley & Sons publishers, Probability and Statistics series, to appear in 2000.

[14] Saltelli A., Tarantola S., and Chan K., (1999). A quantitative, model independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics, 41(1): 39-56.

[15] Saltelli, A., and Bolado, R., (1998). An alternative way to compute Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST). Computational Statistic and Data Analysis, 26(4): 445-460.

[16] Saltelli A., Tarantola S., and Chan K., 1997, Sensitivity analysis of model output: an improvement of the FAST method, EUR Report 17338 EN.

[17] Saltelli and Sobol’ (1995).”About the use of rank transformation in sensitivity analysis of model output”. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 50: 225-239 European Commission - IPSC SimLab 2.2 – Reference Manual 155

[18] Saltelli, A., Andres, T. H., and Homma, T., (1993). Sensitivity analysis of model output; An investigation of new techniques. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 15:211-238.

[19] Saltelli, A., and Marivoet, J., (1990). Nonparametric statistics in sensitivity analysis for model output; A comparison of selected techniques. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 28:229- 253.

[20] Shukhman B. (1993), Generation of quasi-random (LPt) vectors for parallel computation. Computer Physics Communications 78, 279-286.

[21] Sobol' I.M. (1993) Sensitivity estimates for Non-linear Mathematical Models, Mathematical Modelling and Computational Experiment (1) 4 407-414.

[22] Sobol' I.M., Turchaninov V.I., Levitan Y.L., and Shukhman B.V. (1992), Quasirandom sequence generators. Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academic of Sciences,
Moscow.

[23] Stein, M., (1987). Large sample properties of simulations using Latin hypercube sampling. Technometrics, 29(2):143-151.

[24] McKay, M. D., 1995, Evaluating prediction uncertainty, Los Alamos National. Laboratories report NUREG/CR- 6311, LA-12915-MS.

[25]Tarantola, S., Gatelli, D., Mara, T.A. (2005). Random balance designs for the estimation of first order sensitivity indices. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91: 717-727.